Tim Johnson is unable to participate in any debates.
If one has ever visited our legislators in Washington, you will know that our representatives need to be physically capable of moving vigorously from place to place.
|
Advertisement |
It is obvious that Tim Johnson’s health will not permit him such movement. Tim cannot even say, “My name is Tim Johnson and I approve this message.” Tim is a good fellow but he is obviously incapable of effectively representing South Dakota in the U.S. Senate.
This is not the first time that South Dakota faced such a dilemma. Karl Mundt, our Republican senator years ago, had a stroke and was unable to function but refused to resign; thus South Dakota had no senatorial representation in the Senate and no way to require his resignation. This time we do have recourse, Sen. Johnson must stand for re-election next month.
In addition to his physical handicap, he is part of the failed team that has led our nation to a $10 trillion deficit and to the edge of fiscal catastrophe.
If we want to change the outcome of our government we must change the people who have led us into this mess.
Robert Parsons
Pierre


Comments
7 comment(s)Outsider wrote on Oct 17, 2008 2:12 PM:
returned local wrote on Oct 11, 2008 9:41 AM:
Oh my wrote on Oct 10, 2008 12:42 PM:
S.O.S. wrote on Oct 9, 2008 12:16 PM:
gramma wrote on Oct 8, 2008 10:37 AM:
A Local wrote on Oct 7, 2008 6:19 PM:
MyThots wrote on Oct 7, 2008 1:37 PM:
The fact that the author used the word "handicap," tells me that he has little knowledge about people with disabilities.
Because of mobility devices, people have the freedom to be a contributing part of the workforce. Tim shows his wisdom in utilizing devices that gives him freedom. Regarding his speech, there are people from all across the country who serve in the congress, some have thick accents that makes them difficult to understand to the unfamiliar listener.
Should they be banned from serving? "