Eli Lilly to pay $1.4B for off-label drug marketing

South Dakota will keep $475,000 of settlement


Published/Last Modified on Friday, Jan 16, 2009 - 06:05:24 am CST

Capital Journal staff

PIERRE — State Attorney General Larry Long announced Thursday that South Dakota has joined with other states and the federal government and reached a $1.4 billion settlement with Eli Lilly and Co., to settle allegations it engaged in an off-label marketing campaign that improperly promoted the anti-psychotic drug, Zyprexa.

Eli Lilly will pay the states and the federal government a total of $800 million in damages and penalties to compensate Medicaid and various federal health care programs for harm suffered as a result of this conduct. 

Advertisement


South Dakota’s total settlement recovery is $1.4 million. Of that amount, South Dakota will keep $475,000, which represents the state’s share of the Medicaid loss, with the remainder going to the federal government for its share.

Between September 1999 and Dec. 31, 2005, Eli Lilly willfully promoted the sale and use of Zyprexa, primarily through a marketing campaign called “Viva Zyprexa,” for certain uses which the Food and Drug Administration had not approved.

Eli Lilly’s activities in the “Viva Zyprexa” campaign promoted Zyprexa not only to psychiatrists, but also to primary care physicians, for such unapproved uses as the treatment of depression, anxiety, irritability, disrupted sleep, nausea and gambling addiction.

In implementing the campaign, Eli Lilly also provided remuneration and other things of value to physicians and other health care professionals.

As a result, Eli Lilly caused physicians to prescribe Zyprexa for children and adolescents, dementia patients in long-term care facilities, and in unapproved dosage amounts, all of which are uses that were not medically accepted indications for which state Medicaid programs would approve reimbursement.

As part of the settlement, Eli Lilly will enter a Corporate Integrity Agreement with the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Inspector General which will closely monitor the company’s future marketing and sales practices.

This settlement is based on four cases that were filed or consolidated in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania by various relators — private parties that filed actions under state and federal false claims statutes.

The South Dakota Medicaid Fraud Control Unit and the South Dakota Department of Social Services assisted in recovering the settlement money.

WARNING:

Comments are not verified for accuracy nor have we verified the identity of any person’s name accompanying a comment, so please consider this as you weigh any statements made or opinions offered.


NOTE:

• Comments will not be posted if submitted in all caps, or all lower case, or do not show a reasonable attempt to follow basic rules of grammar and punctuation, nor will text-message like abbreviations be accepted, like ur for your.
• Postings must stay on the issues related to the thread and not veer off into personal comments about others. The tone of the post must be civil. For example, you can say someone’s ideas are stupid but you cannot say another poster is stupid.
• Postings must deal with matters of public concern.




Comments

No comments posted.

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comments must be approved by an editor before appearing on the Web site. Editors review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   


Marketplace

Classifieds




Contact Us

Call 605-224-7301

Staff Directory