Residents worry as Oahe rises

By David Montgomery
Capital Journal staff
Published/Last Modified on Thursday, Dec 24, 2009 - 12:11:34 am CST

PIERRE — After years of drought, folks downstream from the Lake Oahe reservoir are bracing for another possible water problem in 2010.

Too much water.

Some area residents and city officials are worried that a large spring runoff will pour in to Oahe, boosting water levels that already are at their highest point in a decade.

This graph shows the average December elevation in Lake Oahe (blue bars) and the average December discharge from Lake Oahe (red line) since 1996. The 2009 figure for elevation is for the month so far; the 2009 figure for discharge is an average of the planned discharge over the next three weeks.
Advertisement


This is a boon for power generation at Oahe Dam, but the possibility of levels rising even higher has people like Brad Lawrence concerned.

“They are gambling that they aren’t going to have a large plains runoff,” said Lawrence, public works director for the city of Fort Pierre. “They are gambling with flooding us.”

Oahe Project administrator John Bartel said those concerns are premature.

“Right now, the pool level is exactly where we like to have it right now,” Bartel said. “An enormous amount of moisture in the upper Missouri basin would have to accumulate before we would start sounding an alarm.”

Lake Oahe is currently 1,607.8 feet above sea level. That’s 10 feet above the average December level for Lake Oahe — and three feet below the highest recorded December level, recorded in 1997 three months before Pierre residents had to build levees along the Missouri to guard against possible flooding.

“We did some preventative measures where we did some sandbagging on the shore,” Bartel said. “That’s not even in the picture right now, because we just don’t know how much moisture’s going to fall.”

State climatologist Dennis Todey said it’s too early to say how much snow will fall in the upper Missouri basin.

“The biggest part of winter precipitation comes in the late winter, in February and March,” Todey said. “We would have to wait until that point to see what kind of snowpack we’re looking at. Currently we’re not looking at any astounding snowpacks.”

Lake Oahe can hold water up to 1,620 feet above sea level. The closest it has ever gotten is 1,618.2 feet above sea level, recorded in 1997.

Currently discharge from Lake Oahe is averaging around 20,000 cubic feet per second, significantly below averages in past Decembers. But despite the lower discharge levels, input is even lower. The lake level is expected to drop half a foot between now and Jan. 8.

For Pierre resident Larry Weiss, a retired engineer, the situation today is reminiscent of 1997.

“I do remember in ’97, we had the same concern and raised the issue with reservoir control of why not lower the elevation prior to spring runoff,” said Weiss, a former member of the city commission. “A little more safety factor would be good — but we’ve got three months of winter left when the reservoir could be lowered.”

Lawrence also believes the Corps should be discharging more water.

“They could have discharged all fall,” he said. “The risk they are creating is a flood risk for the Pierre-Fort Pierre area, and I think that’s an undue risk.”

Bartel said the lake’s level is exactly where the Corps wants it.

“The lake levels are right where they’re supposed to be,” Bartel said. “There’s no perceived dangers out there that we know of.”

If increased snowfall leads to an expectation of a large spring runoff, Bartel said the Corps would revisit its predictions and might discharge more water.

In the meantime, Bartel said the Corps is taking advantage of the high water level to generate electricity. The dam is currently producing power at 95 percent of its capacity — up from 70 percent of its capacity in 2006 when the lake was 40 feet lower.

WARNING:

Comments are not verified for accuracy nor have we verified the identity of any person’s name accompanying a comment, so please consider this as you weigh any statements made or opinions offered.


NOTE:

• Comments will not be posted if submitted in all caps, or all lower case, or do not show a reasonable attempt to follow basic rules of grammar and punctuation, nor will text-message like abbreviations be accepted, like ur for your.
• Postings must stay on the issues related to the thread and not veer off into personal comments about others. The tone of the post must be civil. For example, you can say someone’s ideas are stupid but you cannot say another poster is stupid.
• Postings must deal with matters of public concern.




Comments

6 comment(s)

    no benefit wrote on Dec 29, 2009 12:37 PM:

    " We won't see any benefit in more power being produced. As usual, we live with the dam as an ornament, fun recreation for some, an eye sore for others. Either way our county officials should be put in stocks for raising our electric and water rates when we have an over abundance of both! During this difficult ecomony, people could really benefit from lower rates which would also boost the economy. "

    city electric user wrote on Dec 26, 2009 8:52 AM:

    " With the corp generating more electicity does that mean our city of Pierre price of electiicity is going up or down?

    Or is this another way to just take advantage of us here in South Dakota? "

    Rick wrote on Dec 24, 2009 10:44 PM:

    " Too little water, the Corps doesnt know what they are doing, now too much water and its the same story.

    Maybe the Corps should get out of the Dam business and turn it over to these local experts.

    I'll take my chances with the Corps. "

    Brad Lawrence wrote on Dec 24, 2009 1:02 PM:

    " The Corps of Engineers puts out a report each month listing the elevations of the respective pools and discharges. In that report, the water levels in Oahe and Garrison are listed as "Above Normal". What they mean is above average which has a complete different conotation when compared to "Normal Operational Level".

    So the mis-information so to speak came from the Corps newsletter and they most certainly need to change the way the information is worded to avoid issues like these. "

    Past local wrote on Dec 24, 2009 12:19 PM:

    " Sounds like they know what they are doing? The dam is producing power at a high rate - just like it was intended... the longer it can do this the better it is for everyone. High lake level is also good for the summer economy around your parts... "

    David Mehlhoff wrote on Dec 24, 2009 8:30 AM:

    " Is the CORPS playing fast and loose with our property and lives? If they are wrong about this are they going to pay for the damage caused because they were not proactive enough to release water during the winter and drop the pool elevation? I bet you guys all live at a high and safe elevation. What about us folks down in the valley? "

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comments must be approved by an editor before appearing on the Web site. Editors review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   


Marketplace

Classifieds




Contact Us

Call 605-224-7301

Staff Directory