Farm to market roads facilitate our future

By Bill Even
Published/Last Modified on Tuesday, Dec 29, 2009 - 12:10:09 am CST

Mud.

This single, three-letter word has caused many South Dakota farmers and ranchers to consider using several four-letter words during the struggles of the past year.

Between the wet, snowy spring that adversely affected calving, lambing and planting to the moisture plaguing us at harvest, 2009 was a difficult year.

Advertisement


Despite these setbacks, our all-too-familiar experiences with mud (and gumbo) serve to remind us of the need for good, high quality roads.

These farm-to-market roads are indispensable to agricultural producers; without a way to get our crops and livestock out of the field and into the stream of commerce, our hard work would not show any return.

Our family farm near Humboldt is surrounded by four different farm-to-market roads —unimproved dirt, township gravel, county gravel and a state highway. We use these roads throughout the year and are familiar with the use, maintenance and repair issues facing each of these jurisdictions.

South Dakota has almost 75,000 miles of these roads and as producers we recognize we could not run a competitive, 21st century agricultural operation without them.

Agriculture has changed dramatically in the 80 years since many of these roads were built. Our harvesting methods have advanced from horse-powered threshing machines to combines.

The way we transport grain to market has improved from unlicensed 200 bushel gravity box wagons that paid no wheel tax to semi trucks capable of hauling more than 1,300 bushels.

These improvements in technology increase efficiency, but they also place a greater burden on our roads — roads we as taxpayers own and have a responsibility to maintain.

But road needs extend beyond agriculture.

Rural residents, city workers who commute from small towns and acreages, businesses and production agriculture all depend on these roads to facilitate commerce. They are crucial to our state’s economic future.

Likewise, who owns the vehicles or what is in the vehicles does not matter. This is not an issue of class warfare, urban versus rural or a laundry list of specific, isolated road problems.

This is a question of road and bridge age and how we can strategically position ourselves to allow agriculture to continue to be a powerful economic engine for South Dakota.

Agriculture and its related industries have a $21.3 billion economic impact each year and employ more than 173,000 South Dakotans. Today’s farms and ranches operate in a global environment that transcends township, county, city and state jurisdictional boundaries.

Our rural road needs transcend these same boundaries. The United States became a world leader by developing the best, most comprehensive infrastructure in the world.

Ownership equals responsibility and we have an obligation to ensure our infrastructure can continue to support the demands of a modern economy.

We can continue to use a “band-aid” approach to help relieve specific pressure points in the short-term, but South Dakota roads require a comprehensive, long-term solution that recognizes our needs and adequately addresses the costs.

Our economic future depends on it.

Bill Even is the Secretary of Agriculture for the state of South Dakota.

WARNING:

Comments are not verified for accuracy nor have we verified the identity of any person’s name accompanying a comment, so please consider this as you weigh any statements made or opinions offered.


NOTE:

• Comments will not be posted if submitted in all caps, or all lower case, or do not show a reasonable attempt to follow basic rules of grammar and punctuation, nor will text-message like abbreviations be accepted, like ur for your.
• Postings must stay on the issues related to the thread and not veer off into personal comments about others. The tone of the post must be civil. For example, you can say someone’s ideas are stupid but you cannot say another poster is stupid.
• Postings must deal with matters of public concern.




Comments

2 comment(s)

    To Bill Evan wrote on Dec 30, 2009 7:58 AM:

    " Spot on!!!!
    Get this message to the County Commissioners. "

    Right wrote on Dec 29, 2009 9:47 AM:

    " These roads are critical to our States well being. The problem lies in the way to fund road maintenance and improvements. Many local bridges are 70yrs or older and not capable of handling todays loads. Replacing just 1 small bridge costs about $250,000 and our Local Governments are barely getting by.

    Property taxes, wheel tax, license fees are the primary funding source of this crucial infrastructure. Problem is they also fund education, courthouse, employees and other critical aspects of our lives.

    Maybe the SD Counties need the ability to impose their own gas tax for roads "

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comments must be approved by an editor before appearing on the Web site. Editors review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   


Marketplace

Classifieds




Contact Us

Call 605-224-7301

Staff Directory