How reconciliation would work
By David Montgomery
Published/Last Modified on Tuesday, Jan 19, 2010 - 09:11:30 pm CST
Jeff Davis at The New Republican has a fascinating
post on the options for Democrats if they can't get a 60th vote for health care now.
As a political science major, the most fascinating part for me is this:
...a reconciliation bill amending the health care bill could actually be voted on before the House votes to accept that health care bill.
That’s right. When it comes to enacting laws and then later amending those laws, it doesn’t matter in what order Congress passes bills. All that matters is the order in which the president signs those bills into law. As long as the president signs the health care bill 30 seconds before he signs the reconciliation bill, the latter can amend or repeal any provisions in the former. So the House and Senate could, in theory, vote on a conference report amending the Senate health care bill before the House actually has to take the tougher vote to accept the Senate bill.How amazing/ridiculous is that? You can amend the bill before you pass it. It's like something out of Alice in Wonderland.
Copyright © 2010 Capital Journal
WARNING:
• Comments are not verified for accuracy nor have we verified the identity of any person’s name accompanying a comment, so please consider this as you weigh any statements made or opinions offered.
NOTE:
• Comments will not be posted if submitted in all caps, or all lower case, or do not show a reasonable attempt to follow basic rules of grammar and punctuation, nor will text-message like abbreviations be accepted, like ur for your.
• Postings must stay on the issues related to the thread and not veer off into personal comments about others. The tone of the post must be civil. For example, you can say someone’s ideas are stupid but you cannot say another poster is stupid.
• Postings must deal with matters of public concern.
Comments
No comments posted.