Quantcast
A1 A1
News
editor's pick spotlight topical watchdog centerpiece enterprise featured popular special report top story
COVID-19 in 57 South Dakota Schools; Pierre superintendent says none in district, for now
  • Updated

Mere days into the 2020-21 academic year, South Dakota Department of Health officials confirmed Monday that 57 schools throughout the state have someone — be it a student or a staff member — infected with COVID-19.

That is triple the number of schools reporting COVID-19 infections compared to Friday when department officials said the coronavirus was in 19 South Dakota schools.

This also takes place as South Dakota set a new daily record for “active” COVID-19 infections at 1,570, which is an increase of nearly 200 from Friday.

Pierre School District Superintendent Kelly Glodt said none of the district’s five schools had recorded a positive case as of Monday. However, Glodt said there are “a couple” of parents of students in the district who have tested positive.

“They contacted us, as we wouldn’t get contacted by the Department of Health on those. This is very much appreciated,” Glodt said of the Pierre parents impacted by COVID-19.

This prompted the Capital Journal to ask Glodt if the students with the infected parents were staying away from school at this time.

“Depends on the individual situation,” Glodt said, while adding the students would “certainly not” be in school if they showed any symptoms of the coronavirus.

Glodt added the situation in the schools through three days of in-person instruction has been “really good.”

“I am hopeful our community numbers will stay at a reasonable rate, parents continue to screen kids for symptoms, and everyone takes personal responsibility for limiting exposure in and out of school,” he said.

State COVID-19 DataDepartment of Health officials now have a special page on their website devoted to tracking cases in schools and colleges throughout South Dakota. That is available at https://doh.sd.gov/documents/COVID19/School-College_COVID_cases.pdf, while the main COVID-19 website is https://doh.sd.gov/news/coronavirus.aspx.

Department of Health officials do not identify specific schools or colleges with infections, but the information is otherwise somewhat detailed.

For example, as of Monday, there were 57 K-12 schools in the state with at least one infection for a total of 70 infections in those schools. In other words, some schools have more than one infection.

The total of 70 infections is further broken down into students and staff members, which could include teachers, principals, secretaries, janitors or anyone else who works at the school.

Monday, there were 46 students infected, along with 24 staff members.

As for colleges and universities, on Monday, there were a total of 71 cases in 11 academic institutions. State health officials said 64 of these infections were among students, with the remaining seven among staff members.


News
editor's pick spotlight topical enterprise featured popular special report
Trump Renominated; However, several Republicans are endorsing Biden
  • Updated
  • 2 min to read

President Donald Trump got a boost on Monday by formally earning the 2020 GOP nomination for the nation’s highest office at the Republican National Convention in Charlotte, North Carolina.

“On behalf of South Dakota’s 29 delegates, I proudly cast all of our votes for the President of the United States, Donald J. Trump,” Gov. Kristi Noem said via a virtual connection to the proceedings, overseen by Republican National Committee Chair Ronna McDaniel.

“This is an historic moment in the life of our nation as we re-nominate Donald Trump and Mike Pence for President and Vice President and set our Party on a path to victory. Today’s unanimous re-nomination is a reflection of the unified support for the Trump-Pence ticket,” McDaniel said after all votes were cast. “Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are running on the most radical, socialist, extreme-left ticket in American history, and we must vote like our lives and our country depend on it this November. Our party is unified, our supporters are energized, and we go forward confident in our cause of re-electing President Trump and Vice President Pence 70 days from now.”

However, even as McDaniel speaks of unity, several prominent Republicans have made it clear they are working to help Biden defeat Trump.

A sampling of the pro-Biden Republicans includes:

Former U.S. Sen. Jeff Flake, R-Arizona;

Retired U.S. Sen. John Warner, R-Virginia;

Former Ohio Gov. John Kasich;

Former New Jersey Gov. Christine Todd Whitman;

2010 California gubernatorial nominee and business executive Meg Whitman;

Former U.S. Rep. Susan Molinari of New York; and

Former Secretary of State Colin Powell.

“If we are honest, there is less of a conservative case to be made for re-electing the president than there is a blatant appeal for more rank tribalism. And further division. And more willful amnesia in the face of more outlandish presidential behavior,” Flake stated via Medium regarding his support of Biden.

“I cannot and will not be a part of that. There simply is no future in it. To my fellow Republicans who, like me, believe in the power of conservative ideas — ask yourself: Will we be in a better position to make a conservative case for governing after four more years of this administration? I think we all know the answer,” he added.

Perhaps lending support to Flake’s position, a Monday poll from the Knight Foundation showed that 70% of American college students plan to vote for Biden, compared to just 18% for Trump. The 52-point polling gap among college students is an example of why Republicans such as Flake and Kasich see no future for the GOP in the model of Trump.

Nevertheless, Noem is preparing to address the nation as one of the Wednesday speakers at the RNC. Some of the others scheduled to speak Wednesday are:

Pence

Second Lady Karen Pence

U.S. Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tennessee

U.S. Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, who is currently locked in a contentious re-election battle with Democratic challenger Theresa Greenfield;

U.S. Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-New York, also fighting to keep her seat against Democrat Tedra Cobb;

Kellyanne Conway

Lara Trump


News
spotlight topical watchdog
Hot, dry spell invites drought to South Dakota
  • Updated

Drought moved rather quickly across South Dakota, in the two weeks, making things abnormally dry across 42% of the state’s acres, including Pierre and Fort Pierre, according to the federal drought monitors.

Severe drought even began creeping into the far southwestern corner of the state last week, while a full 64.6% of the state was rated in “D0-D4” levels of drought, from “abnormally dry” on about 42% of the acres, in “moderate drought” on about 21.5% of the land and in “severe drought” on 0.65% of the acres, all in a little line in the southwest corner.

More than half the state’s topsoil is short (43%) or very short (10%) of moisture; 46% has adequate water and 1% surplus, according to the report Monday from U.S. Department of Agriculture’s National Agricultural Statistics Service in Sioux Falls.

That’s a big change from a year ago: on Aug. 25, 2019, only 3% of the state’s top soil was short of moisture; 72% of it had adequate amounts and 25% had surplus moisture.

On June 1, 2019, the wettest 12-month period in state history ended.

In the calendar year 2019, Pierre received 31 inches of precipitation, 11 inches, or 55%, above the 30-year annual average.

Since Jan. 1, Pierre has seen 12.02 inches of precipitation, 2.81 inches below the 30-year norm for the period. A year ago, Pierre had received 23.75 inches of precipitation by Aug. 24, well above a normal year’s worth of precipitation.

Despite a dryer-than-normal spring, last year’s effects were still felt: on June 22 this year, 83% of the state’s top soil had adequate or surplus moisture.

USDA forecast record yields in South Dakota for corn and soybeans this year, based on conditions as of Aug. 1. On Monday, the NASS office reported that the state’s corn crop was rated 64% good and 10% excellent; 5% poor and 3% very poor. A full 30% of the state’s corn crop was dented by Sunday, Aug. 23, a little ahead of the normal pace of maturation of 26% by now.

But the recent dry conditions might change forecasts.

Anthony Bly, soils field specialist for SDSU’s Extension Service, said last week that drought right now will reduce corn yields and the crop needs rain to make harvest turn out the potential that has been there. In his online report, Bly said the recent hot, dry weather, with temperatures in the high 90s for several days, mean heat stress for soybeans and could cut down the “top end yields” in some fields.

Winter wheat was harvested a week or more ago. The state’s spring wheat crop is 91% harvested as of Sunday, ahead of the five-year average of 81% by now, USDA reported.


Shown is a highly magnified photo of the virus that creates COVID-19.


Coronavirus
COVID-19, By The Numbers
  • Updated

3

Deaths attributed to COVID-19 in Hughes County, according to the South Dakota Department of Health as of 4 p.m Monday.

19 (+3 from Friday)Active COVID-19 cases in Hughes County, according to the South Dakota Department of Health as of 4 p.m. Monday.

1 (-3 from Friday)Active COVID-19 cases in Stanley County, according to the state Department of Health as of 4 p.m. Monday.

5,682,491Total COVID-19 cases in the U.S., according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as of 4 p.m. Monday.

173,490Deaths attributed to COVID-19 across the U.S. as of 4 p.m. Monday.

11,425Total COVID-19 cases in South Dakota, according to the state Department of Health as of 4 p.m. Monday. 5,741 of these are men, while 5,684 are women.

1,570 (+194 from Friday)Active COVID-19 cases in South Dakota, according to the state Department of Health as of 4 p.m. Monday.

161Deaths attributed to COVID-19 in South Dakota.

65People “currently” hospitalized for COVID-19 in South Dakota.


News
topical watchdog
Man walking at night on I-29 hit, killed by SUV north of Sisseton
  • Updated

A 46-year-old man walking on Interstate 29 north of Sisseton was struck and killed by a large SUV late Friday night.

According to Tony Mangan, spokesman for the state Department of Public Safety, at 10:22 p.m., Friday, Aug. 21, a 2007 GMC Yukon driven by a 19-year-old woman with five passengers was northbound on I-29 about a half-mile north of Sisseton on I-29 when it struck the man who was walking partly in the driving lane, partly on the shoulder of the road.

The driver and her five passengers — a 43-year-old man; a man of 19; a 14-year-old girl and two 13-year-old boys — were not injured.

No charges are pending against the driver and the investigation still is preliminary, Mangan said. No names were released Saturday by Mangan.

On Monday, Mangan confirmed information in a notice from the Cahill Funeral Chapel in Sisseton that Cornelius Kirk Jr. was victim of the fatal crash.

Kirk was 46, from Rice Lake, Wisconsin and formerly from Sisseton, according to the funeral home.

His funeral service will be held at 11 a.m., Thursday, Aug. 27, in the Lake Traverse District Center near the resort, northwest of Browns Valley, Minnesota on the west side of Lake Traverse, with wake services at 7 p.m., Tuesday, Aug. 25, and Wednesday, Aug. 26, in the District Center.

An average of 8.8 pedestrians have been killed on state highways each year the past two decades; the past decade it’s been 7.2 people killed a year.

In the past decade or so, pedestrians make up about 5.5% of traffic deaths, on average each year, according to figures from the annual reports by the DPS.


News
As COVID-19 cases rise, professionals question effectiveness of contact tracing
  • Updated

Shown is Travis Porco, an ophthalmological biostatistician and disease transmission researcher at the University of California.

Public health professional are questioning the extent and effectiveness of contact-tracing efforts in South Dakota and across the country. They argue that an inadequate number of investigators and lags in testing times have reduced the efficacy of the tracing process.

Contact tracing aims to reduce the spread of infectious diseases, including COVID-19, by quickly identifying people who may have been exposed to the virus. Investigators question people who test positive for the virus and then try to determine who else they may have come in contact with. Those people are then warned to isolate, watch for symptoms and get tested if they feel sick.

The process is seen as a critical tool in the fight against COVID-19 and other diseases such as tuberculosis because it can break or slow the cycle of transmission from one person to another.

When combined with high rates of testing and social distancing, contact tracing has been shown to slow the spread of COVID-19 and speed up the ability of countries such as South Korea, Singapore and Germany to safely re-open their national economies.

Investigating COVID-19 cases has taken on heightened importance in South Dakota in recent weeks as the state has seen a surge in its number of new cases. On Aug. 20, South Dakota reported 125 new cases of the disease and had the nation’s second-highest rate of transmission, according to state and federal data.

The state also reported on Aug. 20 that at least two dozen COVID-19 cases were related to the Sturgis motorcycle rally, including two notices about the potential for significant public exposures, and school districts and colleges were already reporting cases among students just days into the new academic year.

South Dakota Department of Health leaders say their contact-tracing efforts are keeping up with the increasing caseload. The state’s goal is to make contact with everyone who tests positive for COVID-19 in South Dakota within 24 hours of the department being notified of the new case.

The 131 contact tracers now working for the health department are making initial contacts with known COVID-19 patients within about 15 hours on average, said Cassie Deffenbaugh, who leads the contact-tracing team. The state contact-tracing workforce has grown to five times its pre-pandemic size since March, and has been able to identify 35,000 close contacts of coronavirus patients during the pandemic so far. Deffenbaugh said she is confident that the state’s contact tracers would be able to keep up with the virus.

“We are adequately staffed to be able to support our current workload,” Deffenbaugh said. “We are constantly assessing to make sure we are adequately staffed at this time and that we will be moving forward.”

But some disease researchers say the contact-tracing workforce is not widespread enough in South Dakota to handle the rising number of cases. Without increased availability of COVID-19 testing and speedier test result reporting — along with extensive social-distancing and increased mask usage — experts worry that contact tracers likely will be overwhelmed and the benefits of the process will be muted.

“I don’t think that we can afford, at this point, for contact investigation to stop the epidemic alone. It would have to be done at such a national scale with such speed and efficiency, that I don’t think that’s feasible,” said Travis Porco, an ophthalmological biostatistician and disease transmission researcher at the University of California at San Francisco who has been studying contact tracing since the pandemic began. “We really just don’t have a single magic bullet at this point, we need a little bit of everything to try to turn the tide.”

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention told Congress, in June, that the country needed a minimum of 100,000 contact tracers to adequately manage the COVID-19 pandemic.

But an Aug. 7 survey of state health departments conducted by Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security and National Public Radio found that there were just 41,122 contact tracers actively working in the U.S. Adding 59,000 more contact tracers to the workforce would cost billions of dollars, CDC officials said.

The Johns Hopkins/NPR survey also found that just three states — Maine, New Hampshire and Vermont — had enough contact tracers on staff to adequately track their COVID-19 cases. Three additional states — Montana, Michigan and Hawaii — would have enough contract tracers if they would bring in reserve staff. The South Dakota health department did not participate in the survey.

A News Watch analysis of the Contact Tracing Workforce Estimator created by the Fitzhugh Mullan Institute for Health Workforce Equity at George Washington University shows the state would need 638 contact tracers in order to adequately cover the average number of new cases found between Aug. 4 and Aug. 18. Hiring several hundred more contact tracers could cost millions of dollars and could likely take months.

Contact tracing can be an essential public health tool for managing a pandemic, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Aggressively tracking down and identifying who, how and when people become infected with COVID-19 and then selectively quarantining people who have been in contact with or have been diagnosed with the virus can break chains of transmission. Breaking the chain of transmission can prevent widespread outbreaks, reducing both the number of deaths from the disease and its negative economic effects.

“Contact tracing is useful because it allows us to help people at direct risk of infection, rather than only being able to act in ways that help the whole community, which helps us use broad actions like shelter-in-place more sparingly, and also ensures that we can direct our time and attention to where they’re needed most.,” said Eric Lofgren, an epidemiologist and assistant professor at Washington State University.

South Korea, for example, was once second only to China in the severity of its COVID-19 problem. But an aggressive, nationwide contact-tracing campaign, combined with high levels of testing, have helped contain outbreaks and keep the number of new cases under control. Since the beginning of July, the country of 50 million has seen an average of fewer than 60 new cases per day.

In one well publicized incident, South Korea’s investigators identified a popular nightclub in the country’s capital, Seoul, as the source of a potential COVID-19 outbreak after someone at the nightclub tested positive for the virus. Contact tracers used surveillance cameras, credit card records and personal interviews to track transmission from the nightclub to a student, a taxi driver and someone who worked at a warehouse with 4,000 employees, all before they could spread the disease further. The outbreak was capped at 156 cases.

The South Korean economy, meanwhile, has remained largely open, though heavily impacted by declines in export trade due to the pandemic. South Koreans are still going to restaurants and bars and using air travel for vacations.

Contact tracing can also help identify people at the most risk from COVID-19 due to old age or a preexisting health condition such as diabetes early so they can be monitored more closely and provided health care more quickly when needed. Contact tracing is also about the only way to find people who are carrying the virus but aren’t displaying symptoms so they can be quarantined, Porco said. Any delay in testing people or in getting test results will reduce the value of contact tracing because infected people have more time to spread the illness to more people.

“What contact tracing gives you, if it’s done well, is the chance to out run the epidemic a little bit,” Porco said. “If you find a case fast enough. And you can find their contacts, you could intervene.”

Investigating disease transmissions through contact tracing is not a new concept in South Dakota. It has been common practice in the public health field for decades as an effective tool for helping to control the spread of infectious diseases such as tuberculosis or measles and even sexually transmitted infections such as syphilis or HIV.

Prior to the pandemic, the SDDOH employed 21 contact tracers officially known as Disease Intervention Specialists. After the pandemic began, the health department spent an additional $1.2 million on contact tracing and added 110 contact tracers, known as COVID Intervention Specialists. They are spread out among health department offices in Aberdeen, Pierre, Rapid City, Sioux Falls and Watertown. Increased funding for contact tracing came as part of federal pandemic relief efforts such as the CARES Act.

Every person who tests positive for SARS-COV-II, the virus that causes COVID-19, is supposed to be investigated by the state’s contact-tracing team, Deffenbaugh said. The contact tracing process begins when DOH is notified that someone has tested positive for the virus. South Dakota state law requires healthcare providers to notify the state immediately when they suspect someone has a respiratory illness such as COVID-19.

The state’s goal is to make contact with a person who has tested positive for the COVID-19 virus within 24 hours of the department being notified of the test. The initial contact includes some education on COVID-19 and what to expect from the disease as well as how to avoid spreading the disease to others.

Contact tracers can even help people find places to self isolate if quarantining in their home isn’t feasible, Deffenbaugh said. So far, the health department has helped 48 people find a place to quarantine outside their home.

But the most important thing contact tracers do is identify a COVID-19 patient’s close contacts, which includes anyone the patient had been within six feet for 15 minutes or more up to 48 hours before showing symptoms. The interview includes questions about the patient’s workplace, social gatherings, activities and home life.

The idea is to collect as much contact information on a patient’s close contacts as possible and then notify each close contact to alert them of the possible exposure. The patient’s close contacts are then advised to self isolate, monitor themselves for symptoms and get tested for the disease if symptomatic.

“Ultimately, our goal is to do everything that we can to help them identify the people that may have been exposed,” Deffenbaugh said. “People are very good at working with us and ultimately they care about the people that they may have exposed.”

Once the investigation has been completed, each contact is supposed to be enrolled in a daily monitoring program so contact tracers can follow-up via text message or phone calls to ask about symptoms and provide resources for quarantining or isolating. Monitoring lasts until a person is deemed recovered from COVID-19 or fails to develop symptoms for up to 14 days after being exposed.

Sometimes a contact-tracing investigation reveals that someone spent time at a crowded event or a bar and can’t provide information on everyone they came into close contact with, Deffenbaugh said. When that happens, the state issues an alert with the date, time and location of the potential exposure. Recent examples include notices issued on Aug. 18 and 20 after a person who spent time in a Sturgis saloon and a tattoo parlor worker tested positive for COVID-19. On Aug. 14, the state issued an alert after a person who attended a concert at the Sioux Empire Fairgrounds in Sioux Falls tested positive for the virus.

Contact tracing is an expensive, resource-intensive process. It requires many people making many contacts by phone and aggressively investigating every new COVID-19 case thoroughly and quickly. Testing for the virus must be conducted quickly and results from tests must be turned over to health departments in a timely fashion. Tests for the virus also need to be widely available to anyone, not just those displaying symptoms, Porco said.

“Contact investigation, if done well, is very intensive. It takes a lot of resources,” Porco said.

For all of its importance, contact tracing has a number of shortfalls. For one thing, contact tracing in South Dakota relies on people to answer phone calls, often from strange numbers. In today’s world of random robo-calls and phone scammers, that can be a big ask, Deffenbaugh said.

“We do have instances where we may not be able to get a hold of someone; that is one of the challenges we have,” Deffenbaugh said. “Obviously there are a lot of unknowns, [but] as we’re doing our case investigations, we are identifying those contacts.”

Because contact tracing is such an expensive, time-consuming activity, public health agencies can struggle to scale up their efforts when disease transmission rates are high. Transmission rates and case numbers are high enough now, Porco said, that there is likely no way to bring enough new contact tracers online fast enough to slow the spread of the virus.

Some areas should consider another lock down, Porco said, and testing availability as well as the speed of testing need to be improved. The use of masks and social distancing could be improved, he said.

“[Contact tracing] is great because it can be a tool for protecting vulnerable people, we can find a lot of asymptomatic carriers and get them out of disease circulation,” Porco said. “It’s a big help. But it’s not going to reduce the need, unfortunately, for masks and social distancing.”